Susquehannock

Site 61 is way to close to neighbors and very steep hill to carry everything up and down!!

Would be nice if they eliminated generators. The generators are for RV's that are closed up with their air or whatever else is so important at a primitive campground while tenters have to sit & listen to them all night. There are hundreds of campgrounds that they can plug in but nope, they want to take one of the last primitive non electric campgrounds with their campers that cost tens of thousands of dollars to ruin others around them. Even with the 10 pm quiet hr rule that most disregard, it is ridiculous that while sitting around my site we have to yell to hear each other. Been coming here over 20 years & it just gets worse & worse. Also wish they would of left the bathrooms gender assigned, I never used to have to wipe the urine off the toilet when it was used by only females.

We have been coming here for a decade and have camped our way around the waterfront, from the cliffside to the point. This was our last visit to Susquehannock and we have canceled our camping plans there in August.

As usual, we paid extra for waterfront sites (61/62) with expectations suited for our visit (shady trees, disabled access, privacy). The sites have been completely renovated, with level tables, better water access, and new fire rings. The sites are on top of each other, they took out a lot of trees, and the rings for 62 and 63 are very close together.

There was an extended family w/kids and a dog on our site when we arrived. They moved their brood to the adjacent vacant sites (64/65) and continued to swim and play at 61/62. Then a fam of 4 cut through right next to our camp to the lake. Regrettably, I initiated words. The man told me to read the rules. He was right, there is waterfront access for all now per the rules. It seems we live in a world now where some people just cut through other peoples' campsites. The larger family returned the second night to swim in front us and disregarded any privacy we hoped for on vacation.

The rules state that anyone has the right to waterfront access. I think a public waterfront area is warranted for all the campers. But I don't agree with the delivery of the changes. No privacy, no trees as a buffer, and anyone from the campground can drive their 2 cars full of family (then one car back to shuttle a third set of ppl) to hang out in, and boaters from interior sites revving engines on what I had hoped and expected was a nice quiet getaway.

We haven't been able to get a site in Susquehannock since the pandemic — one reason I was unaware of the changes to the site. But I missed any messaging they might have released regarding changes to the sites and the rules. It now feels like they put in more sites with the promise of water access while removing any semblance of the way it was, the privacy and the ambiance.

We have been coming here for a decade and have camped our way around the waterfront, from the cliffside to the point. This was our last visit to Susquehannock and we have canceled our camping plans there in August.

As usual, we paid extra for waterfront sites (61/62) with expectations suited for our visit (shady trees, disabled access, privacy). The sites have been completely renovated, with level tables, better water access, and new fire rings. The sites are on top of each other, they took out a lot of trees, and the rings for 62 and 63 are very close together.

There was an extended family w/kids and a dog on our site when we arrived. They moved their brood to the adjacent vacant sites (64/65) and continued to swim and play at 61/62. Then a fam of 4 cut through right next to our camp to the lake. Regrettably, I initiated words. The man told me to read the rules. He was right, there is waterfront access for all now per the rules. It seems we live in a world now where some people just cut through other peoples' campsites. The larger family returned the second night to swim in front us and disregarded any privacy we hoped for on vacation.

The rules state that anyone has the right to waterfront access. I think a public waterfront area is warranted for all the campers. But I don't agree with the delivery of the changes. No privacy, no trees as a buffer, and anyone from the campground can drive their 2 cars full of family (then one car back to shuttle a third set of ppl) to hang out in, and boaters from interior sites revving engines on what I had hoped and expected was a nice quiet getaway.

We haven't been able to get a site in Susquehannock since the pandemic — one reason I was unaware of the changes to the site. But I missed any messaging they might have released regarding changes to the sites and the rules. It now feels like they put in more sites with the promise of water access while removing any semblance of the way it was, the privacy and the ambiance.

We had a very nice stay. The campsites were spacious and clean. The area was beautiful.

Always such a nice get away for my family!

Perfect location. Campsites were good. We go every year.

Used to be a quiet get away. Now anyone can use the path to the water even if you have a campsite on it. Tried swimming & people on site next to us had boats & sea doos coming thru on shoreline & blocking us from even getting back to the shore. Sitting on shore relaxing & people walking right up to you putting their own chairs next to ours even though they had a path themselves to the water. But that was for their boat. So they had the whole shore line between two sites. No respect anymore. No common sense. Literally had someone come up & tie a boat off next to our chairs when they didn't even camp there & knew the people that already had a boat & 2 sea doos blocking our path. I have camped here for 24 years & now looking to go somewhere else. So many empty sites because people reserve them & don't show up yet can't find a site to reserve.

Great campsite near the water

Great location and beautiful view!